Artificial photosynthesis to reduce CO2

Panasonic do it again. After the solar powered ship we wrote about , the company has just announced it had developed an artificial photosynthesis system aiming to convert CO2 into organic materials by using sunlight and a nitride semiconductor. Although there were other such solutions over the past years, this one claims to be much more efficient and simple, on par with plants. Its apparent use is in power plants, incinerators and industrial facilities.

If you are still wandering why companies bother to invent such things and who will buy them, the answer is that for several years now, CO2 emissions have a cost. Before, no one cared about the smoke out of the industrial chimney, but since government put a price on every ton, companies now have a financial yardstick to compare to when formulating their investment plans.

But what if you don’t have a facility under any of the cap-and-trade schemes? Well, carbon is an indirect cost to those companies as well. It is called Green PR and is part of the CSR budgets of many large companies who calculate their footprint and neutralize it via purchasing carbon credits. The less you purchase, the better for your marketing department.

Read the full article on Panasonic’s website. And check out the process on the below picture, courtesy of Panasonic.

2 Responses to Artificial photosynthesis to reduce CO2

  1. Juan says:

    Green technology tends to save more money in the long run, disepte being more expensive to begin with for example, motion-sensing light fixtures that only turn on when someone walks into a room are more expensive than regular lights, but after a few years the reduced power usage saves money. What examples of green energy are you looking at that are so cost-inefficient? Around here (Midwest) people have been installing windmills, which are quite green that have consistently proven profitable.

    • Najmeddine says:

      I am sorry but this is a BS project bescuae what they found was already a well known situation at the time the research was done so to claim the results are somehow Weird or Unprecedented displays ignorance on the part of the researcher and the person that wrote the article! It also displays the level of scientific knowledge of the site that published this! They call themselves Science Daily This shows they chose the wrong name. Almost like Realclimate that displays a Surreal awareness of Climate issues!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Be a Green Hero, Go to Carbon Zero Follow us Facebook Twiter RSS